The latest news from the Casino world!
Gambling club casino news entain betcity

Entain and BetCity owners settle after long dispute

British gambling company Entain and the previous owners of Dutch gambling company BetCity have finally reached a settlement in their long-running dispute. The details remain secret, but Entain did confirm that they have settled the matter, without further payment or hassle in the future.

This finally brings an end to an issue that began in December 2023 and has been in the news for a long time.

In December, Entain decided to go to court because they felt that the BetCity owners had not been honest during the takeover. According to Entain, they had not disclosed that the Gaming Authority had started investigations into BetCity. This caused bad blood, and a legal battle with accusations on both sides ensued.

BetCity owners file counterclaim

The former owners of BetCity felt that their reputation was seriously affected and also filed a complaint against Entain. They claim that Entain did indeed know about the investigations. And it didn’t stop there: according to them, Entain also made adjustments to BetCity’s business operations, which led to lower revenues.

They were quite angry about this, because this happened precisely during the period in which they were still entitled to a share of the turnover. That last point only fueled the fire in the battle.

No preliminary hearing, but a settlement

It seemed that a long process would follow, with a first preliminary hearing scheduled for the end of October. But instead of waiting for that hearing, both parties decided to continue negotiating in silence. At the beginning of November, they suddenly announced that a settlement had been reached.

Entain later confirmed this to CasinoNieuws.nl:

“Entain has resolved its dispute with the sellers of BetCity. We cannot say anything about the terms of the settlement. The settlement resolves all disputes relating to the takeover of BetCity. Entain is not required to make any future payments under the transaction documentation.”

In the official documents, a so-called Tomlin Order, it was agreed that both parties would not provide any further information about the settlement amount. With that, the case is closed, and nothing more will be announced about this matter.

 | 

At the heart of the Gambling Club is our dedicated journalist, Maxime (32), whose passion for journalism goes beyond simply reporting facts. With a keen eye for detail and an insatiable curiosity, Maxime strives to uncover the stories that matter, that shape our communities, and that impact the world around us.

With years of experience in the gambling industry, ranging from local news reporting to international investigations, Maxime brings a deep understanding of the complexities of today’s news landscape.

Recommended

BetMGM criticised for campaign featuring young athlete

On 2 June 2025, the Kansspelautoriteit (Ksa), the Dutch gambling regulator, issued an official warning to BetMGM. At issue was an advertisement on a well-known news website featuring 17-year-old football prodigy Lamine Yamal. The campaign breached Dutch legislation prohibiting the use of public figures in gambling advertisements, particularly when targeting vulnerable groups such as minors.

Influencers under surveillance: the end of impunity?

From 16 June 2025, the Dutch Commissariaat voor de Media (CvdM) will be extending its monitoring to a wider range of influencers. Until now, only those with more than 500,000 subscribers were concerned. From now on, any content creator active on YouTube, Instagram or TikTok who has published at least 24 paid videos in the last 12 months and is registered with the Chamber of Commerce will be subject to this enhanced surveillance.

RvKS criticises regulators’ inaction

On 29 May 2025, the Raad voor de Kansspelspelers (RvKS), a Dutch organisation representing gamblers, announced its withdrawal from any active participation in the debate on gambling policy in the Netherlands. In an open letter, the RvKS denounces a system that, in its view, fails structurally to bring about meaningful change and to take gamblers’ expertise seriously.