The latest news from the Casino world!
Gambling club casino news entain betcity

BetCity riot: Former owners fight back in lawsuit with Entain

The dispute between Entain and the former owners of BetCity takes a new twist. The former owners accuse Entain of violating the agreement and are demanding damages.

In May, Entain filed a claim in court, alleging that BetCity’s former owners had wrongly filed a counterclaim. Entain stated that BetCity’s bonus costs had been calculated incorrectly and that the proposed VAT exemption was not possible.

The former owners of BetCity now refute these accusations in a thirteen-page response. They argue that Entain increased the bonus costs without their consent and that the VAT exemption was indeed possible through Entain’s offices in Malta and Gibraltar.

Point of discussion

One of the central points in the discussion is the amount of BetCity’s bonus costs in 2023. Entain claims that the costs were unfairly high and that the former owners have violated the agreement. The former owners, on the other hand, state that the bonus costs were increased in consultation in anticipation of the ban on untargeted advertising.

They point out that Entain only asked for formal approval eight months after the increase and that the argument of the advertising ban does not hold water, as this has been known for a long time. Moreover, according to them, one should not only look at the bonus costs, but at the total picture of BetCity’s results in 2023.

VAT exemption

Another point of contention is the issue of VAT exemption. Entain claims that the proposed structure was not possible within the Dutch tax system. The former owners, on the other hand, argue that the structure was indeed possible and that it was included in the business plan and the purchase agreement.

They point out that Entain could use its offices in Malta and Gibraltar to reduce VAT costs. This would be a common practice for international companies such as Entain, and would not be a violation of the agreement, according to them.

What now?

The judge will now have to assess the arguments of both parties and determine who is right. The outcome of the case could have major consequences for both parties.

Entain can claim significant damages if it is proven that the former owners of BetCity have violated the agreement. The former owners, on the other hand, can in turn submit a claim if it turns out that Entain has wrongly increased the bonus costs and refused the VAT exemption.

 | 

In the world of Gambling Club, Ron is a dedicated journalist specializing in casino news in the Netherlands. He combines his keen eye for the gambling industry with a deep-rooted passion for sports.

With his inquisitive nature and eye for detail, Ron focuses on describing trends and transformations within the Dutch casino industry, seamlessly integrating his sports expertise.

With years of experience in journalism, ranging from local reporting to large-scale investigative projects, he offers his readers nuanced and in-depth analyses. In this way, he reveals the fascinating intersections between gaming and sports.

Recommended

Gamusoft LP: illegal activities halted

The Kansspelautoriteit (Ksa) has fined Gamusoft LP for illegally offering games of chance to Dutch players via the csgofast.com website, without a licence and without geographical restrictions. A penalty payment of €280,000 per week, capped at €840,000, was imposed to force the company to cease its activities. This decision is part of the Ksa’s strategy to strictly regulate the online gaming market and protect consumers from the risks associated with unlicensed operators.

Family dispute over winning lottery ticket

In the Netherlands, a winning lottery ticket worth €3.2 million sparked a violent family dispute between a man from Rijswijk and his 80-year-old father-in-law. After buying several tickets and discovering that he had the winning number, the complainant claimed that his father-in-law had discreetly stolen the precious ticket from him.

Minors targeted by 711 B.V.: Ksa alert

The Kansspelautoriteit (Ksa) has sanctioned 711 B.V. after it broadcast gambling advertisements targeting minors. The incident revealed flaws in the company’s advertising practices, and it has acknowledged its responsibility and taken corrective action. Although the company did not receive an immediate financial penalty, the Ksa stressed the importance of strict supervision and transparency in gambling advertising, particularly to protect young audiences from the associated risks.