The latest news from the Casino world!
Gambling club casino news poker stars

Gamblers claim multi-million against illegal online casinos

Dutch courts in North Holland and Amsterdam recently asked the Supreme Court for advice. The issue: players trying to claw back money from online casinos that operated before regulation but were not licensed. This follows a series of conflicting rulings in ongoing lawsuits.

Fight over refunds

Since the legalization of online gambling in the Netherlands many players have been trying to get back money they lost at online casinos that did not have a Dutch license. However the rulings in these lawsuits vary.

In some cases, players won their cases against major providers such as Bwin, PokerStars and Unibet. However, a court in Breda recently ruled in favor of Bwin. According to this court, Article 1 of the Gambling Act (Wok) no longer applies to the validation of gambling contracts. As a result, players cannot rely on this article to claim back money.

Supreme Council must provide clarity

To put an end to these inconsistencies, the courts in Amsterdam and North Holland have submitted several questions to the Supreme Court, according to the Dutch press.

These questions mainly concern the interpretation and application of Article 1 of the Betting and Gaming Act. This article prohibits offering gambling services without a license from the Dutch Gaming Authority (KSA).

The courts want to know whether this article invalidates contracts between Dutch consumers and unlicensed providers. They also wonder whether social changes or enforcement policy influence this. They also want to know whether the fact that the KSA uses certain criteria for issuing licenses is important. Finally, they investigate whether, if the contracts are declared invalid, players can claim money back on the basis of unlawful enrichment.

Major lawsuits against Pokerstars and PartyCasino

There are currently two major cases in Amsterdam and North Holland. In both cases, players are demanding €135,000 from PartyCasino and PokerStars respectively.

These clawback claims are part of a broader legal battle. In total, there are approximately 50 lawsuits pending in various Dutch courts seeking clarification on these issues.

The preliminary rulings of the courts in Amsterdam and North Holland appear to be in favor of the players. This could lead to the conclusion that agreements with unlicensed providers can be declared null and void. However, before making final decisions, the courts first want to seek advice from the Supreme Court in order to ensure more uniformity in the judiciary.

 | 

In the world of Gambling Club, Ron is a dedicated journalist specializing in casino news in the Netherlands. He combines his keen eye for the gambling industry with a deep-rooted passion for sports.

With his inquisitive nature and eye for detail, Ron focuses on describing trends and transformations within the Dutch casino industry, seamlessly integrating his sports expertise.

With years of experience in journalism, ranging from local reporting to large-scale investigative projects, he offers his readers nuanced and in-depth analyses. In this way, he reveals the fascinating intersections between gaming and sports.

Recommended

BetMGM criticised for campaign featuring young athlete

On 2 June 2025, the Kansspelautoriteit (Ksa), the Dutch gambling regulator, issued an official warning to BetMGM. At issue was an advertisement on a well-known news website featuring 17-year-old football prodigy Lamine Yamal. The campaign breached Dutch legislation prohibiting the use of public figures in gambling advertisements, particularly when targeting vulnerable groups such as minors.

Influencers under surveillance: the end of impunity?

From 16 June 2025, the Dutch Commissariaat voor de Media (CvdM) will be extending its monitoring to a wider range of influencers. Until now, only those with more than 500,000 subscribers were concerned. From now on, any content creator active on YouTube, Instagram or TikTok who has published at least 24 paid videos in the last 12 months and is registered with the Chamber of Commerce will be subject to this enhanced surveillance.

RvKS criticises regulators’ inaction

On 29 May 2025, the Raad voor de Kansspelspelers (RvKS), a Dutch organisation representing gamblers, announced its withdrawal from any active participation in the debate on gambling policy in the Netherlands. In an open letter, the RvKS denounces a system that, in its view, fails structurally to bring about meaningful change and to take gamblers’ expertise seriously.