The latest news from the Casino world!
Gambling club casino news kansspelautoriteit

Gamusoft LP: illegal activities halted

The Kansspelautoriteit (Ksa) has fined Gamusoft LP for illegally offering games of chance to Dutch players via the csgofast.com website, without a licence and without geographical restrictions. A penalty payment of €280,000 per week, capped at €840,000, was imposed to force the company to cease its activities. This decision is part of the Ksa’s strategy to strictly regulate the online gaming market and protect consumers from the risks associated with unlicensed operators.

On 17 April 2025, the Kansspelautoriteit (Ksa) announced that it had imposed a penalty payment on Gamusoft LP. The company is accused of illegally offering games of chance to Dutch players via the csgofast.com website. This measure is intended to force Gamusoft LP to cease its illegal activities immediately.

Practices that do not comply with regulations

According to the Ksa’s investigations, the csgofast.com website allowed Dutch users to create an account, make deposits and participate in games of chance without having the required licence. No technical measures had been put in place to prevent access by Dutch players, in direct contravention of the laws in force.

The Ksa imposed a penalty payment of €280,000 per week on Gamusoft LP, with a ceiling of €840,000. This financial penalty is intended to deter the company from continuing its illegal activities and to protect Dutch consumers from the risks associated with unregulated gambling.

A reinforced regulatory strategy

Since the legalisation of online gambling in the Netherlands in October 2021, the Ksa has stepped up its efforts to regulate the market and protect players. The measures taken against Gamusoft LP are part of this strategy to eliminate unauthorised operators and ensure a safe and fair gaming environment.

This is not the first time that the Ksa has taken action against illegal operators. For example, in 2024, Gammix Limited was fined €19.6 million for similar offences. These actions demonstrate the Ksa’s determination to enforce gambling regulations.

The Ksa is sending a strong signal to operators who try to circumvent Dutch regulations. Financial sanctions and coercive measures are essential tools for maintaining the integrity of the gambling market and protecting consumers.

 | 

In the world of Gambling Club, Ron is a dedicated journalist specializing in casino news in the Netherlands. He combines his keen eye for the gambling industry with a deep-rooted passion for sports.

With his inquisitive nature and eye for detail, Ron focuses on describing trends and transformations within the Dutch casino industry, seamlessly integrating his sports expertise.

With years of experience in journalism, ranging from local reporting to large-scale investigative projects, he offers his readers nuanced and in-depth analyses. In this way, he reveals the fascinating intersections between gaming and sports.

Recommended

Family dispute over winning lottery ticket

In the Netherlands, a winning lottery ticket worth €3.2 million sparked a violent family dispute between a man from Rijswijk and his 80-year-old father-in-law. After buying several tickets and discovering that he had the winning number, the complainant claimed that his father-in-law had discreetly stolen the precious ticket from him.

Minors targeted by 711 B.V.: Ksa alert

The Kansspelautoriteit (Ksa) has sanctioned 711 B.V. after it broadcast gambling advertisements targeting minors. The incident revealed flaws in the company’s advertising practices, and it has acknowledged its responsibility and taken corrective action. Although the company did not receive an immediate financial penalty, the Ksa stressed the importance of strict supervision and transparency in gambling advertising, particularly to protect young audiences from the associated risks.

SEGA SAMMY forced to complete Stakelogic acquisition

After signing an agreement to acquire Stakelogic for an estimated €130 million, Japanese giant SEGA SAMMY tried to pull out of the deal at the last minute, citing ‘contractual breaches’. The Amsterdam court categorically rejected this attempt.