The latest news from the Casino world!
Gambling club casino news entain betcity

Entain and BetCity dispute: preliminary hearing cancelled

A major preliminary hearing was scheduled for October 31 in the case between gambling giant Entain and the former owners of BetCity. However, that is no longer the case. Both parties have decided that the hearing will not take place.

Why exactly did they agree to that? That remains a mystery for the time being. It could mean that they are trying to work it out behind the scenes, but that has not been confirmed anywhere.

Why the hearing will not take place

The preliminary hearing was originally intended to prepare the lawsuit between Entain and the former owners of BetCity. Think of a kind of preliminary meeting where the lawyers and judges consider how the case should proceed. But now there is suddenly no hearing anymore.

This was confirmed on October 9 by the High Court for Commercial Disputes in the United Kingdom. CasinoNieuws.nl was the first to report the news, but they too did not receive an explanation as to why the hearing was cancelled.

The only information we have is that both parties have mutually chosen not to proceed. What does this mean for the progress of the case? That remains a matter of guesswork for now. There is always a chance that they will reschedule the hearing later, if necessary.

Entain and BetCity are keeping their lips sealed

You would think that both parties would want to say a little more about what is going on, but no. Both Entain and the former owners of BetCity are not commenting. A bit typical, because usually something is released. Entain’s PR manager Chris Alfred was also short and sweet: “We do not comment on ongoing cases.”

The fact that the hearing is not going ahead does not mean that the dispute has been resolved. It is possible that there will be a lot more fighting to come, but for now it is quiet on both sides.

A claim worth millions in the air

What we do know is that there is more at stake than just a date for a preliminary hearing. In March of this year, the former owners of BetCity hit back with a counterclaim. They are demanding a whopping €104 million from Entain.

What exactly is this counterclaim about? That is not entirely clear yet. What is certain is that it is about a lot of money and that this case is far from over.

 | 

In the world of Gambling Club, Ron is a dedicated journalist specializing in casino news in the Netherlands. He combines his keen eye for the gambling industry with a deep-rooted passion for sports.

With his inquisitive nature and eye for detail, Ron focuses on describing trends and transformations within the Dutch casino industry, seamlessly integrating his sports expertise.

With years of experience in journalism, ranging from local reporting to large-scale investigative projects, he offers his readers nuanced and in-depth analyses. In this way, he reveals the fascinating intersections between gaming and sports.

Recommended

BetMGM criticised for campaign featuring young athlete

On 2 June 2025, the Kansspelautoriteit (Ksa), the Dutch gambling regulator, issued an official warning to BetMGM. At issue was an advertisement on a well-known news website featuring 17-year-old football prodigy Lamine Yamal. The campaign breached Dutch legislation prohibiting the use of public figures in gambling advertisements, particularly when targeting vulnerable groups such as minors.

Influencers under surveillance: the end of impunity?

From 16 June 2025, the Dutch Commissariaat voor de Media (CvdM) will be extending its monitoring to a wider range of influencers. Until now, only those with more than 500,000 subscribers were concerned. From now on, any content creator active on YouTube, Instagram or TikTok who has published at least 24 paid videos in the last 12 months and is registered with the Chamber of Commerce will be subject to this enhanced surveillance.

RvKS criticises regulators’ inaction

On 29 May 2025, the Raad voor de Kansspelspelers (RvKS), a Dutch organisation representing gamblers, announced its withdrawal from any active participation in the debate on gambling policy in the Netherlands. In an open letter, the RvKS denounces a system that, in its view, fails structurally to bring about meaningful change and to take gamblers’ expertise seriously.